Dating Fraud at

04 Sept 2020


Dear Jack,

You have taken my previous evidence seriously and have acted on it–although you do not specify what action you have taken against the two women involved in the fraud that I reported in my email of 21 April 2020.

This leaves my claims #2 and #3 which have not been addressed at all.

#2   Visitors by Country [using]


Using, one can discover the percent of visitors according to the country of origin.  The results are shown above.

Argumentation:  96% of my emails and chartroom conversations were with women that identified themselves as currently living in China.   Yet, in the “Visitors by Country” table above, no visitors from China are listed (meaning it is less than a fraction of 1%).

Something is wrong here.  At least 30% of the visitors to your site should be located in China.  But clearly they are not.  The only way to explain this is to conclude that the vast majority of the “certified Chinese women” shown on your site are falsely listed as being located in China.

For three years now I have been living in China.  During this time I have become aware of the routine linguistic and grammatical errors that Chinese make when speaking/writing English as their second language.  What I discovered, however, is that women in your chat rooms do not make these errors.  They make errors that are akin to those made by my Indian students who participated in my online courses.  This is what first alerted me to the probability that many of the persons I met on your dating site were Indian women who were fraudulently impersonating Chinese women.  I also found it suspicious that the women I have met know little or nothing about the Chinese cities that supposedly inhabit.

The data above confirms this suspicion and demonstates that most of my communication on your site was with avatars or bots living in the USA and India.  This helps me understand why my two favorite Chinese women that I met on your site were able to communicate using American slang so well.  These were the women, in fact, who were Americans disguising themselves as “Chinese women.”

The Use and Abuse of Identity Verfication

Your website tricks it users.  You make a point of insuring that all the women shown on the site have submitted their photos and documents so as to earn an “Validate Member” certificate that is proudly displayed above their name, location, and high-quality pics.  Here is the guarantee in you own words:

We carefully approve all the ladies to be registered on our website. Our lady members’ profiles are not confirmed unless we verify her ID and background. Our regional partners make sure that there are no bogus profiles, that the lady you look at in the profile pictures is the lady you are corresponding with (such profiles have a label “Validated member”).  Also, we make sure as much as we are able to that she is single and interested in communication with other members of the platform.

At no point, however, does the dating site actually guarantee that the woman named and shown in the pics is the same woman who is actually interacting with the men on the dating site.  This is the meaning of an “avatar”– the women  shown and identified are merely “lifeless puppets” that are animated by a living person who has been hired to write messages and produce lively chat room discussions “on their behalf.”  Needless to say, this arrangement makes it appear as though these beautiful and animated women are considering me for their playmates and spouses.  In reality, however, it is all a staged fraud.  The avatars profess their love; but, at every turn, excuses are given why it is impossible to actually meet with me.

Lest anyone think that “Identity Verification” is a guarantee to the men that they are selecting and interacting with the women so glamorously displayed on this site, here are the clauses to read and reread among the “Disclosures and Disclaimers”:

No representations or warranties (whether express[ed] or implied) are made regarding the accuracy and correctness of the information on the platform (including, but not limited to the statistical numbers or online status of certain members etc.).

Validated Members [i.e. all the women you meet here] may use the platform for free. At the same time, Suppliers are prohibited from paying Validated Members for the use of the platform.  [Nothing is said about payment to avatars.]

LovingFeel does not guarantee the accuracy of the identification verification conducted by Suppliers.   source

In brief, the “Suppliers” provide the identities of the women shown on the site.  How the Suppliers gain these identities, however, is not disclosed.  I can imagine that photographic studios give a 50% discount to women when they allow their vanity picture set to be used by the dating site.  The identity of the women and their profiles might be partially accurate but nothing prevents the Suppliers from inventing profiles so as to protect the identity of the women.

Furthermore, it is altogether suspicious that so many [nearly 10%] of the women describe themselves as “doctors.”  I have yet to find any profile where a woman identifies herself as a “nurse.”  But such obvious errors are to  be expected as you say, “LovingFeel does not guarantee the accuracy of the identification verification conducted by [the] Suppliers.

I have already played a significant role in exposing the systemic fraud of a half-dozen dating sites. I have also learned much from the debacle.  See details here =

I’m sure you are aware that along with all your spinoff sites are “at risk” due to my research and findings.  I have already copied large segments of your website and have a bullet-proof demonstration of the depth of fraud operating on your dating site.

Testing the validity of

Before coming to a rash conclusion, however, I wanted to test the validity of   Accordingly, I used with and discovered that 29.7% of the users were located in China and 23.5% were located in Japan. thus clearly demonstrates the fact that 50% of its users are from China or Japan—as would be expected.  At the same time, I am absolutely certain that correctly demonstrates that next to NONE of the women I communicated with on were located in China.  Their profiles may have come from China, but the avatars hiding behind the profiles have no connection with China and, under no circumstances, did I have a chance in hell to ever meet any of them face-to-face (even though I actually live in China).

#3  I came to with the hope of having a pleasant experience in meeting, in understanding, and in dating Chinese women.  I am bitterly disappointed in finding that your fraudulent practices have severely betrayed my trust.

I just now did a search and found a site that provides a balanced and trustworthy investigation of the scam being perpetrated by you and your directors:  “ Admits To Creating Fake Profiles & Deceptions Exposed In This Review.”


In view of this, I ask you and your directors to return all monies that I have spent in buying credits and to offer me $900 [my lost time computed at $25/hr.] to partially compensate me for the waste of time and energy and grief that you inflicted upon me. 


Aaron Milavec  profile ID: 21145426


How to thrive in a malfunctioning church